<%@ Language=VBScript %> <% BaseURL="http://www.ovrdrv.com" Path=Trim(lcase(Request.ServerVariables("Path_Info"))) nP=InStrRev(Path, "/") if nP > 0 then Page = lcase(mid(Path, nP + 1)) section="" end if %> Overdrive Online Marketing Blog: Is Your Brand Resistant to Change?<% if inStr(Path,"/labels") > 0 then %>: <%=Page%><%end if%>

 

Is Your Brand Resistant to Change?

posted by Nick Cifuentes @ Friday, February 12, 2010 - 9:30 AM
In 2010, the exchange between consumers and brands will in no doubt increase among new media marketing channels. Just in the first couple of months of 2010, I have already seen countless posts outlining CRM models that are stressing the point to consume ROI for Social Media and take action to begin integrating this into your brand campaigns that live within on and offline social media channels.

With so much stress to one observation of social media marketing in 2010, it’s important to make light of another key observation in the Future of Social Media blog series: The Resistance to Change Ending.

It was Benjamin Franklin who said:
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
This quote, although philosophical in reasoning, is quite the pragmatic approach when applied to the idea of social media marketing. There have been countless charts and graphs that apply from reputable marketing research publications, such as eMarketer.com and 2010 Forrester Reports that point to all directions of brands shifting dollars into interactive marketing, with a focus in new (social) media – however, there is still hesitation among the masses when it comes to the decision of whether this type of marketing is a intelligent investment.

This drives me to think how and why a CMO would be hesitant to change their ways, and I believe between now and 2010 – this approach will change for the way brands who don’t consider social media or any type of new media an investment – to turn their eyes away from fear and begin shifting the paradigm. In light of this, I have come up with five reasons why it seems brands are resistant to change (this is an opinion – so I absolutely welcome comments)

  • Reason #1: The brand is, in general, negative or against all that is new or different.

  • Reason #2: The brand is not interested in change; they have other goals they want to pursue.

  • Reason #3: The brand does not understand the message and/or the consequences that the change will have.

  • Reason #4: The brand does not trust the person who communicates the initiative.

  • Reason #5: FEAR.

Although these reasons are somewhat built around generalities, it’s important to recognize a few practical truths. Brands have taken time to absorb social media marketing into their programs, and that will continue to be the case, however between 2008 and 2009, U.S. Marketers alone using Social Media within their programs nearly doubled in percentages – an increase likely to continue.



Just alone in ad spending within online social networks worldwide, between 2008 and what is expected by 2011; the same type of increase is likely to continue.




Just another hint to where things are headed…

In the end, a brand is afraid to change, and will never make this type of jump overnight. The five reasons above, I’m sure, point to a number of individuals you might know, or very well could be at your organization; it’s very likely. The resistance to change is led by a faithful bunch, your typical ‘old style’ leaders who oppose the new digital spectrum, but slowly are adopting to the early styles of interactive marketing, such as email marketing because he/she is forced to. They could also still rely on patchy TV & radio spots, and could be very excited buy out page five inside a dying magazine publication – this exists; it’s hard to think this is an actuality – but it truly is.

This AdWeek Media Poll shows that the 45-55+ demographic are much more in tune to purchasing newspaper/magazine ads as opposed to the younger demographic. Is this because of they are cheaper these days? Yes. Is this because they are unfamiliar and afraid to commit to the digital space, definitely YES.



I’m not saying age is the key indicator, but it certainly is a diving off point when making certain predictions that pertain to driving home this thought of resistance to change. In all reality, and I’m not screaming from the weeds here, it’s fear. In a time of economic recovery, such as what we are sifting through at the moment – FEAR; scream it from the top of your building, or as high as you could possibly reach – there is a resistance to change because of a FEAR of what might happen in changing the way your brand is marketed - I can’t be any more forthright.

Prediction: By 2012, if your brand has not already begun shifting the marketing channel to a more open, two-way communicative, “social” environment; you could very well be left in the dust, watching the grass grow over you.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Blog Search

 

RSS Feeds

 Atom
 RSS

Subscribe to Overdrive eMarketing Blog by Email





Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

<% '-- add your label directory here labelDir = "m:\web\users\V029U45EBY\html\ovrdrv\blog\labels\" '-- Check for Directory Set FSO = Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") If FSO.FolderExists(labelDir) Then Response.Write "
    " Set labelFolder = FSO.GetFolder(labelDir) Set labelBlogs = labelFolder.Files For each label in labelBlogs Set labelFile = FSO.GetFile(label) Set labelStream = labelFile.OpenAsTextStream (1, -2) iLabelCount = -1 '-- Read the file line by line Do While Not labelStream.AtEndOfStream Line = labelStream.readline LineCount = Sgn(InStr(Line,"blogger-labels")) iLabelCount = iLabelCount + LineCount Loop Response.Write "
  • " + Replace(labelFile.Name,".asp","") & " (" + CSTR(iLabelCount) & ")
  • " Set labelStream = nothing Set labelFile = nothing Next Response.Write "
" Else Response.Write "

No labels in folder: " & labelDir & "

" End If Set FSO = nothing %>